The wolf was hunted to extinction in Britain around 250 years ago but according to today’s Guardian and the BBC, a new study published by the Royal Society that claims that there could be considerable ecological benefits from the reintroduction of the wolf to the Scottish Highlands
The study's authors say that allowing packs of wolves to patrol the Highlands could solve an emerging ecological problem with Red Deer numbers, which have reached record levels in the last 30 years (Some estimates suggest that there could be 500,000 deer in the Highlands). In many areas they are perilously close to the land's natural "carrying capacity". Culls and “sporting” activities have helped to keep deer numbers static but the wolf could bring about a significant reduction in numbers.
Eleanor Milner-Gulland, of Imperial College London said: "We have shown that reintroducing wolves would significantly reduce the need for expensive culling, and the resulting decline in deer numbers would lead to a marked increase in plant and birdlife biodiversity, and reforesting the area would be easier too." Excessive deer numbers were having an impact on bird species, such as the capercaillie. Wolves would prey on the deer and would help rebalance the ecology, giving other tree and bird species a chance to establish themselves.
Up to 500 wolves could be released across the Highlands, allowing up to 25 wolves a territory of about 1,000 sq km . Within 50 or 60 years, the study’s authors calculate, deer numbers would fall to a quarter of the present levels.
The findings met immediate approval from the charity Trees for Life, which is planning to plant 100,000 native trees this year as part of its programme to rebuild the ancient "Caledonian forest" But Alan Watson Featherstone, its executive director, said the substantial social and economic issues posed by reintroducing the wolf would take at least 20 years to resolve. Government agencies are far less convinced, as are conservation bodies such as the Scottish Wildlife Trust and the RSPB. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), the official conservation agency, and the Deer Commission for Scotland, which oversees deer conservation and control policy, said these problems were far greater than the wolf's backers suggested.
Professor Colin Galbraith, director of science at SNH, said the study was a useful contribution to the debate. "It's a bit theoretical, but it's quite well done in terms of the science," he said. However, the central issue of proving that a reintroduction was "socially acceptable" was actually essential, both legally and practically. Globally accepted guidelines on reintroducing species set out by the World Conservation Union made clear that if an animal was once hunted to extinction by humans, it would be unacceptable to reintroduce that animal where it would again be targeted by man. "That's very, very important. This is where the concept of reintroducing wolves to Scotland probably falls down," SNH has again ruled out wolf reintroduction. Last week, it confirmed that it plans to focus solely on reintroducing sea eagles to Scotland and, over the next five years, to rekindle proposals to bring back beavers, a scheme controversially rejected by the Scottish executive two years ago.
Reintroduction of wolves is also deeply unpopular with farmers. Anna Davies, a spokeswoman for the National Farmers' Union in Scotland, said: "The reintroduction of wolves into the wild would present significant problems in terms of sheep predation, and that is the reason why it is not widely popular among farmers."
Dr Coulson, of Imperial College London said he believed that any reintroduction plan was still a long way from becoming a reality. "Our research is just one of the first steps towards understanding the consequences of a wolf reintroduction in Scotland."
I somehow doubt there will be wolves roaming the Highlands anytime soon but I must admit the idea does appeal.
wolf conservation
5 comments:
This has been done on my side of the pond. Farmers are compensated for losses to herds.
Ranchers have a chokehold on wildlife policy here in the US. The single most glaring example is the Yellowstone bison which are the last wild herd left in the US. Ranchers successfully campaigned to have bison designated 'livestock' in their efforts to control the herd migrating onto public land that is leased by the ranchers for grazing rights. Long story short gv't. $ is used to slaughter wilflife(and let's not forget as citizens we own those bison from a NP)the second it steps over the park boundry. They DFG wait in their vehicles esp. during the winter when feed is scarce. Sick. I invite anyone reading this to check out the Buffalo Field Campaign (bfc.org). They are the only org. out there 24/7 protecting wildlife. Good luck to the wolves.
Jen
I get the feeling that there will be too much opposition to their reintroduction. Even the reintroduction of the European Beaver is stalled and they are different behaviourwise to their american counterparts. I doubt no amount of compensation would assuage fears about a much misunderstood animal
Thanks for the info jen. I will look up the site. To have them designated as livestock just isn't right.
Anyone else reading this- when you check out bfc.org why not slip 'em a fin. Just giving $ sounds crass, I know, but it does help them continue their good work. Maybe post a link, 'Jams'....
later-
Jen
thanks jen but bfc.org is a religious organisation...www.buffalofieldcampaign.org looks very interesting.
Post a Comment