25 May 2009

North Korean nuclear test

North Korea says it has staged a "successful" underground nuclear test more powerful than the first one conducted by the stare in October 2006. (according to the BBC and just about every other news source)

An official communiqué read out on North Korean state radio said another round of underground nuclear testing had been "successfully conducted... as part of measures to enhance the Republic's self-defensive nuclear deterrent in all directions". The test had been "safely conducted at a new high level in terms of explosive power and control technology" and would "contribute to safeguard the sovereignty of the country and the nation and socialism.”

The North gave no details of the test location, but South Korean officials said that a seismic tremor was detected in the north-eastern part around the town of Kilju - the site of North Korea's first nuclear test. The US Geological Survey said a 4.7-magnitude quake was detected at 0054 GMT, 10km (six miles) underground.

Russian news agencies quoted the defence ministry as saying said its systems had detected a blast of "between 10 and 20 kilotons" - making it much bigger than the 2006 test, which the US said was less than a kiloton.

The test has prompted international condemnation and an emergency session of the UN Security Council is being convened by Russia, which currently occupies the council's rotating presidency.

Hmm I daresay there will be more expressions of condemnation but the deed is done and it does look like the North Koreans have worked out how to do it properly this time. I daresay that others will analyse this event far better than I ever could

but I will sum up my thoughts in two words – “not good”. It was interesting, however, to see what the useful idiots at the Korean Friendship Association had to say. I was pleasantly surprised to see one use the word "calumniated". I had never seen it used before!


James Higham said...

So where does it go from here?

Steve Hayes said...

Not good, indeed.

Who knows what water supplies and the like it will pollute. One thingks of the poor guinea pigs who suffered from other nations' nuclear tests.

But seeing that most of the condemnation comes from nations with the biggest nuclear stockpiles, I'm inclined to dismiss it as hypocritical overreaction. "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone" etc.

jams o donnell said...

I'm not sure James, but I'm sure we shall see,

It is not a good step at all. Inevitably one or more nation will decide to use its stockpile. That's what really frightens me

Kay Dennison said...

Seriuously not good indeed!!!!!

And oh yeah, thanks for McGonagall!

jams o donnell said...

Definitely Kay. Glad you liked McG!

Anonymous said...

After 2006 now you have done another tests and by this what will be the results.Adults In London

Ardent said...

Israel keeps harping on that Iran is a nuclear threat, but they are not saying much about North Korea who are actually testing bombs.

Steve Hayes said...

Isn't Israel also a nuclear threat?

jams o donnell said...

In my view all nuclear states are potentially dangerous