16 May 2010

A Greater Iran? I shudder to think

Yesterday a radical cleric called for the creation of a "Greater Iran" that would rule over the entire Middle East and Central Asia, in an event that he said would herald the coming of Islam's expected messiah.

Ayatollah Mohammad Bagher Kharrazi said the creation of what he calls an Islamic United States is a central aim of the political party he leads called Hezbollah, or Party of God, and that he hoped to make it a reality if they win the next presidential election.

Kharrazi's comments were published Saturday in his newspaper, Hezbollah. He said he envisioned a Greater Iran that would stretch from Afghanistan to Israel, bringing about the destruction of the Jewish state. He also said its formation would be a prelude to the reappearance of the Mahdi, a revered ninth-century saint known as the Hidden Imam, whom Muslims believe will reappear before judgment day to end tyranny and promote justice in the world.

" Besides Israel, he said the union would also destroy Shiite Iran's other regional adversaries, whom he called "cancerous tumors." He singled out secular Arab nationalists such as members of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party in Iraq, as well as followers of Wahabism, the version of Sunni Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia.

Kharrazi's comments reveal the thinking of a growing number of hard-liners in Iran, many of whom have become more radical during the post election political. The growing voice of hard-liners like Kharrazi has deepened worries even if it appears unlikely such a divisive figure would win the 2013 presidential election. Kharrazi, however, is not highly influential in Iran's clerical hierarchy and his views do not represent those of the current government.

Still, even President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Thursday that he expects the government which follows his to be "ten times more revolutionary."

Kharrazi sounds like an idiot who would bring the Middle East to destruction (not that there aren’t enough mental cases in the region already). Even if he is not particularly popular across the populace I dread to think who among the Baseej and the Revolutionary Guards are listening to him...

5 comments:

susan said...

It seems to me the world already has more than enough fanatics. Maybe if we all shudder often enough the resulting wind will blow them all away to someplace they can work out their differences personally.

Kay Dennison said...

How in Allah's name are those nut cases over there ever going to agree on *anything*? Methinks 'tis a recipe for disaster! Then again, maybe they'll get so busy fighting among themselves, they'll leave us alone,

beakerkin said...

But Hugo and George are big fans surely they can't be wrong. Seriously, what makes their opinions
more relevant than Ringo Starr or the
meter maid.

jams o donnell said...

If only Susan!

Sadly these thing boil pver... and if it shuts off oil from the Midle East......

jams o donnell said...

Hmm Ringo should be world president!